> Yes, I think %z is preferable. It used to be a glibc (et al)
> extension, but I think it's now specified in C99 (we should double
> check that).
It is.
Segher
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:55:11AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:50:52 -0500
> Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 10:51:29AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > > David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:50:52 -0500
Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 10:51:29AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > What compiler/platform is this? I can't off
So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 10:51:29AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > What compiler/platform is this? I can't off the top of my head think
> > > of one where size_t shouldn't be promoted to int automa
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 10:51:29AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What compiler/platform is this? I can't off the top of my head think
> > of one where size_t shouldn't be promoted to int automatically.
>
> Only types narrower than int are subject t
David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What compiler/platform is this? I can't off the top of my head think
> of one where size_t shouldn't be promoted to int automatically.
Only types narrower than int are subject to integer promotion.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:43:13PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hrm I'm very dubious about this.
What compiler/platform is this? I can't off the top of my head think
of one where size_t shouldn't be promoted to int automatically.
Or there's
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
tests/get_name.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/get_name.c b/tests/get_name.c
index 2481741..a76bdf8 100644
--- a/tests/get_name.c
+++ b/tests/get_name.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ void check_name(void *fd
