On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 14:46 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
+ ALT_FTR_SECTION_END_NESTED_IFCLR((CPU_FTR_PPCAS_ARCH_V2), 487)
So if I remember properly, this means you key off if both
CPU_FTR_NOEXECUTE and CPU_FTR_NODISRALIGN are clear... is
there a point ? You make the patch simpler by only
Hi Ben,
So if I remember properly, this means you key off if both
CPU_FTR_NOEXECUTE and CPU_FTR_NODISRALIGN are clear... is
there a point ? You make the patch simpler by only keying
on NO_EXECUTE which afaik is a power4 or later only feature no ?
Was going to do that, but noticed ARCH_V2
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 16:51 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c: if
(cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PPCAS_ARCH_V2))
I'm ok either way, should I respin to use CPU_FTR_NO_EXECUTE?
Yeah, that sysfs bit will be true if -either- of the two bits is true,
which is yet another
Remove CONFIG_POWER4_ONLY, the option is badly named and only does two
things:
- It wraps the MMU segment table code. With feature fixups there is
little downside to compiling this in.
- It uses the newer mtocrf instruction in various assembly functions.
Instead of making this a compile
Remove CONFIG_POWER4_ONLY, the option is badly named and only does two
things:
- It wraps the MMU segment table code. With feature fixups there is
little downside to compiling this in.
- It uses the newer mtocrf instruction in various assembly functions.
Instead of making this a compile
