On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:14:03PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
With dynamic irq descriptors the overhead of a large NR_IRQS is much lower
than it used to be. With more MSI-X capable adapters and drivers exploiting
multiple vectors we may as well allow the user to increase it beyond the
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 10:09 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:14:03PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
With dynamic irq descriptors the overhead of a large NR_IRQS is much lower
than it used to be. With more MSI-X capable adapters and drivers exploiting
multiple
With dynamic irq descriptors the overhead of a large NR_IRQS is much lower
than it used to be. With more MSI-X capable adapters and drivers exploiting
multiple vectors we may as well allow the user to increase it beyond the
current maximum of 512.
32768 seems large enough that we'd never have
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 22:14 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
With dynamic irq descriptors the overhead of a large NR_IRQS is much lower
than it used to be. With more MSI-X capable adapters and drivers exploiting
multiple vectors we may as well allow the user to increase it beyond the
current
