On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 06:23:09PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 22:48 -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ppc_md.power_off hook performs the same function that the
pm_power_off hook is supposed to. However, it is
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 11:01 -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 06:23:09PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 22:48 -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ppc_md.power_off hook performs the same function that
On 12/4/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 11:01 -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 06:23:09PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 22:48 -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 13:05 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
We could simply have the setup code copy the ppc_md.power_off pointer
into pm_power_off; that we retain the nice assignment in
define_machine(), but eliminate the duplicated calls.
Good idea.
Ben.
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:05:46PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
On 12/4/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 11:01 -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 06:23:09PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 22:48
From: Mark A. Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ppc_md.power_off hook performs the same function that the
pm_power_off hook is supposed to. However, it is powerpc-specific
and prevents kernel drivers (e.g., IPMI) from changing how a platform
is powered off. So, get rid of ppc_md.power_off and replace
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 22:48 -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ppc_md.power_off hook performs the same function that the
pm_power_off hook is supposed to. However, it is powerpc-specific
and prevents kernel drivers (e.g., IPMI) from changing how a
