On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 08:01 AM, Li Zhang wrote:
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -293,13 +293,20 @@ static inline bool update_defer_init(pg_data_t *pgdat,
>> unsigned long pfn,
On 03/03/2016 08:01 AM, Li Zhang wrote:
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -293,13 +293,20 @@ static inline bool update_defer_init(pg_data_t *pgdat,
> unsigned long pfn, unsigned long zone_end,
> unsigned long
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Anshuman Khandual
wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 12:31 PM, Li Zhang wrote:
>> From: Li Zhang
>>
>> This patch is based on Mel Gorman's old patch in the mailing list,
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/5/280 which is
On 03/03/2016 12:31 PM, Li Zhang wrote:
> From: Li Zhang
>
> This patch is based on Mel Gorman's old patch in the mailing list,
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/5/280 which is dicussed but it is
Typo here
> fixed with a
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:01:40PM +0800, Li Zhang wrote:
> From: Li Zhang
>
> This patch is based on Mel Gorman's old patch in the mailing list,
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/5/280 which is dicussed but it is
> fixed with a completion to wait for all memory
From: Li Zhang
This patch is based on Mel Gorman's old patch in the mailing list,
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/5/280 which is dicussed but it is
fixed with a completion to wait for all memory initialised in
page_alloc_init_late(). It is to fix the oom problem on X86