On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:29 PM, David Gibson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:02:43PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
Now that all in-kernel-tree DTS files are properly /dts-v1/,
remove direct support for the older, un-numbered DTS
source file format.
Um.. why? I just don't
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:29 PM, David Gibson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:02:43PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
Now that all in-kernel-tree DTS files are properly /dts-v1/,
remove direct support for the older, un-numbered DTS
source file format.
Um.. why? I just
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:44:33AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:29 PM, David Gibson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:02:43PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
Now that all in-kernel-tree DTS files are properly /dts-v1/,
remove direct support for the
Now that all in-kernel-tree DTS files are properly /dts-v1/,
remove direct support for the older, un-numbered DTS
source file format.
Convert existing tests to /dts-v1/ and remove support
for the conversion tests themselves.
For now, though, the conversion tool still exists.
Signed-off-by: Jon
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:02:43PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
Now that all in-kernel-tree DTS files are properly /dts-v1/,
remove direct support for the older, un-numbered DTS
source file format.
Um.. why? I just don't see a compelling reason to remove this
backwards compatibility. It costs
