On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 20:49 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:51:51PM +1000, Russell Currey wrote:
> >
> > In the configure_pe and configure_bridge RTAS calls, the spec states
> > that values of 9900-9905 can be returned, indicating that software
> > should delay for 10^x
On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 08:51 -0700, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> On 03/28/2016 07:51 PM, Russell Currey wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * RTAS can return a delay value of up to 10^5
> > milliseconds
> > + * (RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MAX), which is too long. Only
> > respect
> > +
On 03/28/2016 07:51 PM, Russell Currey wrote:
> In the configure_pe and configure_bridge RTAS calls, the spec states
> that values of 9900-9905 can be returned, indicating that software
> should delay for 10^x (where x is the last digit, i.e. 990x)
> milliseconds and attempt the call again.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:51:51PM +1000, Russell Currey wrote:
>In the configure_pe and configure_bridge RTAS calls, the spec states
>that values of 9900-9905 can be returned, indicating that software
>should delay for 10^x (where x is the last digit, i.e. 990x)
>milliseconds and attempt the call
In the configure_pe and configure_bridge RTAS calls, the spec states
that values of 9900-9905 can be returned, indicating that software
should delay for 10^x (where x is the last digit, i.e. 990x)
milliseconds and attempt the call again. Currently, the kernel doesn't
know about this, and
