Re: [PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 02:01:29PM +0800, Richard Yang wrote: >On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:22:08PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>On 09/09/2015 01:36 PM, Richard Yang wrote: >>>On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:48:21PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:17:18AM +0800, Wei Yang wr

Re: [PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:22:08PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >On 09/09/2015 01:36 PM, Richard Yang wrote: >>On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:48:21PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: >>>On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:17:18AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: Hi, Michael Hope you didn't take this yet. We ma

Re: [PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:52:32PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: >tatus: O >Content-Length: 6303 >Lines: 176 > >On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:36:16AM +0800, Richard Yang wrote: >>On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:48:21PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: >>>On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:17:18AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: Hi,

Re: [PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 02:59:11PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 11:36 +0800, Richard Yang wrote: >> The VF EEH is hung since we re-designed the SRIOV. After the re >> -design, we >> don't have VF groups. >> >> My plan is to push the VF EEH patch set after the SRIOV R

Re: [PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs

On 09/09/2015 01:36 PM, Richard Yang wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:48:21PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:17:18AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: Hi, Michael Hope you didn't take this yet. We may change this patch a little. [Cc Alexey who might concern the SRIOV status] Ric

Re: [PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs

On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 11:36 +0800, Richard Yang wrote: > The VF EEH is hung since we re-designed the SRIOV. After the re > -design, we > don't have VF groups. > > My plan is to push the VF EEH patch set after the SRIOV Redesign is > accepted. What do you mean taht we don't have VF groups ? If we

Re: [PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:36:16AM +0800, Richard Yang wrote: >On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:48:21PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: >>On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:17:18AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >>>Hi, Michael >>> >>>Hope you didn't take this yet. We may change this patch a little. >>> >> >>[Cc Alexey who migh

Re: [PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:48:21PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: >On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:17:18AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >>Hi, Michael >> >>Hope you didn't take this yet. We may change this patch a little. >> > >[Cc Alexey who might concern the SRIOV status] > >Richard, do you have plan to get it ups

Re: [PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:17:18AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >Hi, Michael > >Hope you didn't take this yet. We may change this patch a little. > [Cc Alexey who might concern the SRIOV status] Richard, do you have plan to get it upstream? It seems it's hanged over here for long time. >On Fri, Jul 17

Re: [PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs

Hi, Michael Hope you didn't take this yet. We may change this patch a little. On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:02:41PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >When VF BAR size is larger than 64MB, we group VFs in terms of M64 BAR, >which means those VFs in a group should form a compound PE. > >This patch links those V

[PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs

When VF BAR size is larger than 64MB, we group VFs in terms of M64 BAR, which means those VFs in a group should form a compound PE. This patch links those VF PEs into compound PE in this case. [gwshan: code refactoring for a bit] Signed-off-by: Wei Yang Acked-by: Gavin Shan --- arch/powerpc/pl