Re: [PATCH kernel v4 0/4 repost] powerpc/ioda2: Yet another attempt to allow DMA masks between 32 and 59

2019-07-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 06:43:12PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > > e.g. if you have a DMA that supports 40-bit DMA addressing we could > > always treat it as if supports 32-bit addressing,and I thought the > > powerpc code does that, > > powerpc does that and this is what the patchset is ch

Re: [PATCH kernel v4 0/4 repost] powerpc/ioda2: Yet another attempt to allow DMA masks between 32 and 59

2019-07-15 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 13/07/2019 01:28, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 07:45:05PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: This is an attempt to allow DMA masks between 32..59 which are not large enough to use either a PHB3 bypass mode or a sketchy bypass. Depending on the max order, up to 40 is usu

Re: [PATCH kernel v4 0/4 repost] powerpc/ioda2: Yet another attempt to allow DMA masks between 32 and 59

2019-07-12 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 07:45:05PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > This is an attempt to allow DMA masks between 32..59 which are not large > enough to use either a PHB3 bypass mode or a sketchy bypass. Depending > on the max order, up to 40 is usually available. Can you elaborate what you ma

[PATCH kernel v4 0/4 repost] powerpc/ioda2: Yet another attempt to allow DMA masks between 32 and 59

2019-07-12 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
This is an attempt to allow DMA masks between 32..59 which are not large enough to use either a PHB3 bypass mode or a sketchy bypass. Depending on the max order, up to 40 is usually available. Changelogs are in the patches. This is based on sha1 a2b6f26c264e Christophe Leroy "powerpc/module64: U