On 05/18/2012 08:24 AM, Li Zhong wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 15:52 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
On 05/17/2012 09:58 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 12:01 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
This patch tries to fix following lockdep complaints:
.../...
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 16:54 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
On 05/18/2012 08:24 AM, Li Zhong wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 15:52 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
On 05/17/2012 09:58 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 12:01 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
This patch tries to fix
On 05/17/2012 09:58 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 12:01 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
This patch tries to fix following lockdep complaints:
.../...
pseries_notify_cpu_idle_add_cpu() actually does
cpuidle_disable_device(), and then cpuidle_enable_device(), which
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 15:52 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
On 05/17/2012 09:58 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 12:01 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
This patch tries to fix following lockdep complaints:
.../...
pseries_notify_cpu_idle_add_cpu() actually does
This patch tries to fix following lockdep complaints:
[ 81.882506] =
[ 81.882508] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[ 81.882511] 3.4.0-rc4-autokern1 #1 Not tainted
[ 81.882513] -
[ 81.882516] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 12:01 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
This patch tries to fix following lockdep complaints:
.../...
pseries_notify_cpu_idle_add_cpu() actually does
cpuidle_disable_device(), and then cpuidle_enable_device(), which
releases and allocates the resources respectively. ( Also, all
