Le 13/10/2021 à 09:48, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 13/10/2021 à 09:39, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 13/10/2021 à 09:23, Kees Cook a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Behind a location, lkdtm_EXEC_RODATA() executes a real function,
not a copy
Le 13/10/2021 à 09:39, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 13/10/2021 à 09:23, Kees Cook a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Behind a location, lkdtm_EXEC_RODATA() executes a real function,
not a copy of do_nothing().
So do it directly instead of using
Le 13/10/2021 à 09:23, Kees Cook a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Behind a location, lkdtm_EXEC_RODATA() executes a real function,
not a copy of do_nothing().
So do it directly instead of using execute_location().
And fix displayed addresses by
Le 13/10/2021 à 09:09, Kees Cook a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Behind a location, lkdtm_EXEC_RODATA() executes a real function,
not a copy of do_nothing().
So do it directly instead of using execute_location().
I don't understand this. Why
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Behind a location, lkdtm_EXEC_RODATA() executes a real function,
> not a copy of do_nothing().
>
> So do it directly instead of using execute_location().
>
> And fix displayed addresses by dereferencing the function descriptors.
>
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Behind a location, lkdtm_EXEC_RODATA() executes a real function,
> not a copy of do_nothing().
>
> So do it directly instead of using execute_location().
I don't understand this. Why does the next patch not fix this?
-Kees
>
Behind a location, lkdtm_EXEC_RODATA() executes a real function,
not a copy of do_nothing().
So do it directly instead of using execute_location().
And fix displayed addresses by dereferencing the function descriptors.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
---
drivers/misc/lkdtm/perms.c | 9
