Re: [PATCH v10 11/12] powerpc: mm: Use set_pte_at_unchecked() for early-boot / internal usages

2024-03-14 Thread LTC IMAP
On Wed, 2024-03-13 at 11:30 +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 13/03/2024 à 05:21, Rohan McLure a écrit : > > In the new set_ptes() API, set_pte_at() (a special case of > > set_ptes()) > > is intended to be instrumented by the page table check facility. > > There > > are however several

Re: [PATCH v10 11/12] powerpc: mm: Use set_pte_at_unchecked() for early-boot / internal usages

2024-03-13 Thread Christophe Leroy
Le 13/03/2024 à 05:21, Rohan McLure a écrit : > In the new set_ptes() API, set_pte_at() (a special case of set_ptes()) > is intended to be instrumented by the page table check facility. There > are however several other routines that constitute the API for setting > page table entries, including

[PATCH v10 11/12] powerpc: mm: Use set_pte_at_unchecked() for early-boot / internal usages

2024-03-12 Thread Rohan McLure
In the new set_ptes() API, set_pte_at() (a special case of set_ptes()) is intended to be instrumented by the page table check facility. There are however several other routines that constitute the API for setting page table entries, including set_pmd_at() among others. Such routines are themselves