On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 07:59:49PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2019, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>
> > On PEF-enabled POWER platforms that support running of secure guests,
> > secure pages of the guest are represented by device private pages
> > in the host. Such pages needn't participat
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On PEF-enabled POWER platforms that support running of secure guests,
> secure pages of the guest are represented by device private pages
> in the host. Such pages needn't participate in KSM merging. This is
> achieved by using ksm_madvise() call which n
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:36:25AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On PEF-enabled POWER platforms that support running of secure guests,
> secure pages of the guest are represented by device private pages
> in the host. Such pages needn't participate in KSM merging. This is
> achieved by using ksm_ma
On PEF-enabled POWER platforms that support running of secure guests,
secure pages of the guest are represented by device private pages
in the host. Such pages needn't participate in KSM merging. This is
achieved by using ksm_madvise() call which need to be exported
since KVM PPC can be a kernel mo
