On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:51:44 +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> The commit fa13a5a1f25f671d084d8884be96fc48d9b68275 (sched: restore
> deterministic CPU accounting on powerpc), unconditionally calls
> update_process_tick() in system context. In the deterministic
> accounting case this is the correct thin
Hallo Tony,
Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The commit fa13a5a1f25f671d084d8884be96fc48d9b68275 (sched: restore
> deterministic CPU accounting on powerpc), unconditionally calls
> update_process_tick() in system context. In the deterministic accounting case
> this is the correct thing to
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 16:51 +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> The commit fa13a5a1f25f671d084d8884be96fc48d9b68275 (sched: restore
> deterministic CPU accounting on powerpc), unconditionally calls
> update_process_tick() in system context. In the deterministic accounting case
> this is the correct thing
The commit fa13a5a1f25f671d084d8884be96fc48d9b68275 (sched: restore
deterministic CPU accounting on powerpc), unconditionally calls
update_process_tick() in system context. In the deterministic accounting case
this is the correct thing to do. However, in the non-deterministic accounting
case we n