Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Implement inline static calls on PPC32 - v2

2022-09-08 Thread Christophe Leroy
Le 08/09/2022 à 02:13, Benjamin Gray a écrit : > On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 16:46 +, Christophe Leroy wrote: >> Surprisingly, I get worst performance with inline static call than >> with >> out of line static call: > > I'm not sure what hackbench is doing, but when microbenchmarking 64 bit >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Implement inline static calls on PPC32 - v2

2022-09-07 Thread Benjamin Gray
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 16:46 +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Surprisingly, I get worst performance with inline static call than > with > out of line static call: I'm not sure what hackbench is doing, but when microbenchmarking 64 bit out-of-line calls in a loop I saw a similar thing where adding

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Implement inline static calls on PPC32 - v2

2022-09-01 Thread Christophe Leroy
Le 09/07/2022 à 08:52, Ard Biesheuvel a écrit : > Hello Christophe, > > On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 19:32, Christophe Leroy > wrote: >> >> This series applies on top of the series v3 "objtool: Enable and >> implement --mcount option on powerpc" [1] rebased on powerpc-next branch >> >> A few

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Implement inline static calls on PPC32 - v2

2022-07-09 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
Hello Christophe, On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 19:32, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > This series applies on top of the series v3 "objtool: Enable and > implement --mcount option on powerpc" [1] rebased on powerpc-next branch > > A few modifications are done to core parts to enable powerpc >

[PATCH v2 0/7] Implement inline static calls on PPC32 - v2

2022-07-08 Thread Christophe Leroy
This series applies on top of the series v3 "objtool: Enable and implement --mcount option on powerpc" [1] rebased on powerpc-next branch A few modifications are done to core parts to enable powerpc implementation: - R_X86_64_PC32 is abstracted to R_REL32 so that it can then be redefined as