On 12/2/20 7:46 AM, Brian King wrote:
> On 12/1/20 6:53 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>> The logic for iterating over the Sub-CRQ responses is similiar to that
>> of the primary CRQ. Add the necessary handlers for processing those
>> responses.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler
>> ---
>> drivers/sc
On 12/1/20 6:53 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> +static void ibmvfc_handle_scrq(struct ibmvfc_crq *crq, struct ibmvfc_host
> *vhost)
> +{
> + struct ibmvfc_event *evt = (struct ibmvfc_event
> *)be64_to_cpu(crq->ioba);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + switch (crq->valid) {
> + case IBM
On 12/1/20 6:53 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> The logic for iterating over the Sub-CRQ responses is similiar to that
> of the primary CRQ. Add the necessary handlers for processing those
> responses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 77
The logic for iterating over the Sub-CRQ responses is similiar to that
of the primary CRQ. Add the necessary handlers for processing those
responses.
Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler
---
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 77 ++
1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
diff -
