On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:34:53 +0800
王贇 wrote:
> On 2021/10/13 下午4:25, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> >>> Side note... the comment will eventually conflict with peterz's
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210929152429.125997...@infradead.org/.
> >>
> >> Steven, would you like to share your opinion on
On 2021/10/13 下午4:25, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>>> Side note... the comment will eventually conflict with peterz's
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210929152429.125997...@infradead.org/.
>>
>> Steven, would you like to share your opinion on this patch?
>>
>> If klp_synchronize_transition() will b
> > Side note... the comment will eventually conflict with peterz's
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210929152429.125997...@infradead.org/.
>
> Steven, would you like to share your opinion on this patch?
>
> If klp_synchronize_transition() will be removed anyway, the comments
> will be meaningl
On 2021/10/13 下午3:55, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
>> b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
>> index a9f9c57..101e1fb 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
>> @@ -208,13 +208,29 @@ static __always_inline voi
> diff --git a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
> index a9f9c57..101e1fb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
> +++ b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
> @@ -208,13 +208,29 @@ static __always_inline void trace_clear_recursion(int
> bit)
> * Use this for f
As the documentation explained, ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()
and ftrace_test_recursion_unlock() were supposed to disable and
enable preemption properly, however currently this work is done
outside of the function, which could be missing by mistake.
This path will make sure the preemption was di
As the documentation explained, ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()
and ftrace_test_recursion_unlock() were supposed to disable and
enable preemption properly, however currently this work is done
outside of the function, which could be missing by mistake.
This path will make sure the preemption was di
