Hello Dave,
Sorry for the delay, I was trying to get the other patch series ready as I
mentioned in the other email.
Am Donnerstag, 18 August 2016, 16:19:46 schrieb Dave Young:
> Since Eric was objecting the extension, I think you should convince him,
> but I will review from code point of view.
Since Eric was objecting the extension, I think you should convince him,
but I will review from code point of view.
On 08/11/16 at 08:03pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> From: AKASHI Takahiro
>
> Device tree blob must be passed to a second kernel on DTB-capable
> archs, like powerpc and arm64,
Here is a new version implementing your suggestions.
I also changed it to kmalloc fdset instead of using the stack.
What do you think?
From: AKASHI Takahiro
Device tree blob must be passed to a second kernel on DTB-capable
archs, like powerpc and arm64, but the current kernel interface
lacks th
Hello Balbir,
Thank you for the review!
Am Freitag, 12 August 2016, 18:17:39 schrieb Balbir Singh:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 08:03:58PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > index 3523bf62f328..847d9c31f428 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 08:03:58PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> From: AKASHI Takahiro
>
> Device tree blob must be passed to a second kernel on DTB-capable
> archs, like powerpc and arm64, but the current kernel interface
> lacks this support.
>
> This patch extends kexec_file_load syst
From: AKASHI Takahiro
Device tree blob must be passed to a second kernel on DTB-capable
archs, like powerpc and arm64, but the current kernel interface
lacks this support.
This patch extends kexec_file_load system call by adding an extra
argument to this syscall so that an arbitrary number of fi