On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 2:46 AM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Kees Cook
>> Sent: 04 February 2016 21:01
>> Some callers of strtobool were passing a pointer to unterminated strings.
>> In preparation of adding multi-character processing to kstrtobool, update
>> the callers to not pass single-characte
From: Kees Cook
> Sent: 04 February 2016 21:01
> Some callers of strtobool were passing a pointer to unterminated strings.
> In preparation of adding multi-character processing to kstrtobool, update
> the callers to not pass single-character pointers, and switch to using the
> new kstrtobool_from_u
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Some callers of strtobool were passing a pointer to unterminated strings.
>> In preparation of adding multi-character processing to kstrtobool, update
>> the callers to not pass single-ch
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> Some callers of strtobool were passing a pointer to unterminated strings.
> In preparation of adding multi-character processing to kstrtobool, update
> the callers to not pass single-character pointers, and switch to using the
> new kstrtobool_fr
Some callers of strtobool were passing a pointer to unterminated strings.
In preparation of adding multi-character processing to kstrtobool, update
the callers to not pass single-character pointers, and switch to using the
new kstrtobool_from_user helper where possible.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
C
