Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] s390/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE

2022-03-30 Thread Gerald Schaefer
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 18:43:27 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote: > Let's use bit 52, which is unused. > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand > --- > arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 23 +-- > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git

[PATCH v2 6/8] s390/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE

2022-03-29 Thread David Hildenbrand
Let's use bit 52, which is unused. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 23 +-- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h index 3982575bb586..a397b072a580