Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/64: Fix section mismatch warnings for early boot symbols

On 04/09/2018 11:51 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: Thanks for picking this one up. I hate to be a pain ... but before we merge this and proliferate these names, I'd like to change the names of some of these early asm functions. They're terribly named due to historical reasons. Indeed :) No

Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/64: Fix section mismatch warnings for early boot symbols

Mauricio Faria de Oliveira writes: > Some of the boot code located at the start of kernel text is "init" > class, in that it only runs at boot time, however marking it as normal > init code is problematic because that puts it into a different section > located at the

[PATCH v3] powerpc/64: Fix section mismatch warnings for early boot symbols

Some of the boot code located at the start of kernel text is "init" class, in that it only runs at boot time, however marking it as normal init code is problematic because that puts it into a different section located at the very end of kernel text. e.g., in case the TOC is not set up, we may not