On 13.04.14 04:27, Liu ping fan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 11.04.2014, at 13:45, Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
When we mark pte with _PAGE_NUMA we already call
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start
and
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 13.04.14 04:27, Liu ping fan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 11.04.2014, at 13:45, Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
When we mark pte with _PAGE_NUMA we
On 14.04.14 10:08, liu ping fan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 13.04.14 04:27, Liu ping fan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 11.04.2014, at 13:45, Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 11.04.2014, at 13:45, Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
When we mark pte with _PAGE_NUMA we already call
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start
and mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end, which will mark existing
When we mark pte with _PAGE_NUMA we already call
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start
and mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end, which will mark existing guest hpte
entry as HPTE_V_ABSENT. Now we need to do that when we are inserting new
guest hpte entries.
Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan
On 11.04.2014, at 13:45, Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
When we mark pte with _PAGE_NUMA we already call
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start
and mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end, which will mark existing guest hpte
entry as HPTE_V_ABSENT. Now we need to do that when we are