On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:06:18PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Fri, May 27 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Any chance we can get this series into $NEXT_KERNEL?
>
> I think I'd rather not in this case, hope that's okay. It hasn't seen
> testing in linux-next yet, there's a reasonabl
Hi Grant,
On Fri, May 27 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> Any chance we can get this series into $NEXT_KERNEL?
I think I'd rather not in this case, hope that's okay. It hasn't seen
testing in linux-next yet, there's a reasonable chance of it breaking
sdhci-pltfm users in subtle ways -- we haven't had
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:06:50AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > Any chance we can get this series into $NEXT_KERNEL?
>
> From the looks, I think it still has problems being a module. Will try
> to test it today.
>
Sorry. I forgot testing module build. I'm fixing it.
--
Regards,
Shawn
__
> Any chance we can get this series into $NEXT_KERNEL?
From the looks, I think it still has problems being a module. Will try
to test it today.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang|
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:01:50PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Here are what the patch set does.
>
> * Remove .probe and .remove hooks from sdhci-pltfm.c and make it be
> a pure common helper function providers.
> * Add .probe and .remove hooks for sdhci pltfm drivers sdhci-cns3xxx,
> sdhci-dove
Here are what the patch set does.
* Remove .probe and .remove hooks from sdhci-pltfm.c and make it be
a pure common helper function providers.
* Add .probe and .remove hooks for sdhci pltfm drivers sdhci-cns3xxx,
sdhci-dove, sdhci-tegra, and sdhci-esdhc-imx to make them self
registered with
