> 2023年3月28日 08:45，Thomas Bogendoerfer 写道：
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:18:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:17:38AM +, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
Is patch a 6.3 candidate or should all of it go into 6.4?
>>>
>>> Please leave it for 6.4, as
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:18:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:17:38AM +, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> > >
> > > Is patch a 6.3 candidate or should all of it go into 6.4?
> >
> > Please leave it for 6.4, as corresponding MIPS arch part will be a part of
> > 6.4.
>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:17:38AM +, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> >
> > Is patch a 6.3 candidate or should all of it go into 6.4?
>
> Please leave it for 6.4, as corresponding MIPS arch part will be a part of
> 6.4.
Ok. I'll really need review from the MIPS and drivers/of/ maintainers,
through.
> 2023年3月23日 21:39，Christoph Hellwig 写道：
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 09:07:31PM +, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>>> 2023年3月23日 07:29，Christoph Hellwig 写道：
>>>
>>> The series looks fine to me. How should we merge it?
>>
>> Perhaps go through dma-mapping tree?
>
> Is patch a 6.3
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 09:07:31PM +, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
>
> > 2023年3月23日 07:29，Christoph Hellwig 写道：
> >
> > The series looks fine to me. How should we merge it?
>
> Perhaps go through dma-mapping tree?
Is patch a 6.3 candidate or should all of it go into 6.4?
> 2023年3月23日 07:29，Christoph Hellwig 写道：
>
> The series looks fine to me. How should we merge it?
Perhaps go through dma-mapping tree?
Thanks
- Jiaxun
The series looks fine to me. How should we merge it?
Hi all,
This series split out second half of my previous series
"[PATCH 0/4] MIPS DMA coherence fixes".
It intends to use dma_default_coherent to determine the default coherency of
devicetree probed devices instead of hardcoding it with Kconfig options.
For some MIPS systems,
