"Edgecombe, Rick P" writes:
> On Wed, 2024-03-13 at 06:44 +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> I understand from this text that, as agreed, this patch removes the
>> pointless/redundant zero-init of individual members. But it is not
>> what
>> is done, see below ?
>
> Err, right. I think I decided
On Wed, 2024-03-13 at 06:44 +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> I understand from this text that, as agreed, this patch removes the
> pointless/redundant zero-init of individual members. But it is not
> what
> is done, see below ?
Err, right. I think I decided to leave it because it was already
Le 12/03/2024 à 23:28, Rick Edgecombe a écrit :
> Future changes will need to add a new member to struct
> vm_unmapped_area_info. This would cause trouble for any call site that
> doesn't initialize the struct. Currently every caller sets each member
> manually, so if new members are added they
Future changes will need to add a new member to struct
vm_unmapped_area_info. This would cause trouble for any call site that
doesn't initialize the struct. Currently every caller sets each member
manually, so if new members are added they will be uninitialized and the
core code parsing the struct
