Re: [PATCH v3 13/31] clk: wrap I/O access for improved portability

2013-08-27 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Anatolij Gustschin (2013-08-23 15:05:39) On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:30:00 -0700 Mike Turquette mturque...@linaro.org wrote: Quoting Gerhard Sittig (2013-07-22 05:14:40) the common clock drivers were motivated/initiated by ARM development and apparently assume little endian

Re: [PATCH v3 13/31] clk: wrap I/O access for improved portability

2013-08-23 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:30:00 -0700 Mike Turquette mturque...@linaro.org wrote: Quoting Gerhard Sittig (2013-07-22 05:14:40) the common clock drivers were motivated/initiated by ARM development and apparently assume little endian peripherals wrap register/peripherals access in the common

Re: [PATCH v3 13/31] clk: wrap I/O access for improved portability

2013-08-03 Thread Gerhard Sittig
[ trimming the CC: list for this strictly clock related and source code adjusting change, to not spam the device tree ML or other subsystem maintainers, just keeping ARM (for clock) and PPC lists and people in the loop ] On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 15:30 -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting

Re: [PATCH v3 13/31] clk: wrap I/O access for improved portability

2013-08-02 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Gerhard Sittig (2013-07-22 05:14:40) the common clock drivers were motivated/initiated by ARM development and apparently assume little endian peripherals wrap register/peripherals access in the common code (div, gate, mux) in preparation of adding COMMON_CLK support for other

[PATCH v3 13/31] clk: wrap I/O access for improved portability

2013-07-22 Thread Gerhard Sittig
the common clock drivers were motivated/initiated by ARM development and apparently assume little endian peripherals wrap register/peripherals access in the common code (div, gate, mux) in preparation of adding COMMON_CLK support for other platforms Signed-off-by: Gerhard Sittig g...@denx.de ---