On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 09:36 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:20:17 +0300
> Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov
> > >
> > > Hi Steven,
> > >
> > > please apply with Michael's acked-by tag.
> >
> > ping
>
> Actually, can you take this through the ppc tr
On 2/5/16, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:20:17 +0300
> Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov
>> >
>> > Hi Steven,
>> >
>> > please apply with Michael's acked-by tag.
>>
>> ping
>>
>
> Actually, can you take this through the ppc tree? The
> TRACE_EVENT_FN_CO
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:20:17 +0300
Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov
> >
> > Hi Steven,
> >
> > please apply with Michael's acked-by tag.
>
> ping
>
Actually, can you take this through the ppc tree? The
TRACE_EVENT_FN_COND is already in mainline.
You can add my:
A
On 1/19/16, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> On 1/12/16, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 23:18 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>
>>> ./drmgr -c cpu -a -r gives the following warning:
>>>
>>> [ 2327.035563]
>>> RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
>>> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks =
On 1/12/16, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 23:18 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>
>> ./drmgr -c cpu -a -r gives the following warning:
>>
>> [ 2327.035563]
>> RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
>> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
>> [ 2327.035564] no locks held by swapper
On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 23:18 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> ./drmgr -c cpu -a -r gives the following warning:
>
> [ 2327.035563]
> RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> [ 2327.035564] no locks held by swapper/12/0.
> [ 2327.035565]
> stack backtrace:
>
On 12/23/15, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:18:06 +0300
> Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>
>> ./drmgr -c cpu -a -r gives the following warning:
>>
>> [ 2327.035563]
>> RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
>> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
>> [ 2327.035564] no locks held by swapp
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:18:06 +0300
Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> ./drmgr -c cpu -a -r gives the following warning:
>
> [ 2327.035563]
> RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> [ 2327.035564] no locks held by swapper/12/0.
> [ 2327.035565]
> stack backtrace:
>
./drmgr -c cpu -a -r gives the following warning:
[ 2327.035563]
RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
[ 2327.035564] no locks held by swapper/12/0.
[ 2327.035565]
stack backtrace:
[ 2327.035567] CPU: 12 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/12 Tainted: G S
4.3.0-rc3-00060-