On 10/12/19 2:21 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 10/10/2019 à 06:44, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
@Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx?
Getting the following :
root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak
test: ptrace-hwbreak
tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty
PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG,
On 10/12/19 1:01 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 10/10/2019 à 08:25, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
On 10/10/19 10:14 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
@Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx?
Getting the following :
root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak
test: ptrace-hwbreak
tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2
Le 10/10/2019 à 06:44, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
@Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx?
Getting the following :
root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak
test: ptrace-hwbreak
tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty
PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok
PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2:
Le 10/10/2019 à 08:25, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
On 10/10/19 10:14 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
@Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx?
Getting the following :
root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak
test: ptrace-hwbreak
tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty
PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO
Le 10/10/2019 à 06:44, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
@Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx?
Getting the following :
root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak
test: ptrace-hwbreak
tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty
PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok
PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2:
On 10/10/19 10:14 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
@Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx?
Getting the following :
root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak
test: ptrace-hwbreak
tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty
PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok
PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok
P
@Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx?
Getting the following :
root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak
test: ptrace-hwbreak
tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty
PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok
PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok
PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok
PTRACE_SET_
Le 07/10/2019 à 08:35, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
On 9/25/19 9:36 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
v3: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2019-July/193339.html
v3->v4:
- Instead of considering exception as extraneous when dar is outside of
user specified range, analyse the instruct
On 9/25/19 9:36 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
v3: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2019-July/193339.html
v3->v4:
- Instead of considering exception as extraneous when dar is outside of
user specified range, analyse the instruction and check for overlap
between user specifi
v3: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2019-July/193339.html
v3->v4:
- Instead of considering exception as extraneous when dar is outside of
user specified range, analyse the instruction and check for overlap
between user specified range and actual load/store range.
- Add self
10 matches
Mail list logo