On Fri Jan 20, 2023 at 5:43 PM AEST, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> It seems a bit unnecessary for the PLPKS code to have a user-visible
> config option when it doesn't do anything on its own, and there's existing
> options for enabling Secure Boot-related features.
>
> It should be enabled by
It seems a bit unnecessary for the PLPKS code to have a user-visible
config option when it doesn't do anything on its own, and there's existing
options for enabling Secure Boot-related features.
It should be enabled by PPC_SECURE_BOOT, which will eventually be what
uses PLPKS to populate
