Re: [PATCH v5] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM

2021-08-18 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Mon, 17 May 2021 11:06:06 +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote: > After a LPM, the device tree node ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory may be > updated by the hypervisor in the case the NUMA topology of the LPAR's > memory is updated. > > This is handled by the kernel, but the memory's node is not

Re: [PATCH v5] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM

2021-08-03 Thread Laurent Dufour
Le 03/08/2021 à 19:32, Nathan Lynch a écrit : Laurent Dufour writes: V5: - Reword the commit's description to address Nathan's comments. Thanks. Still don't like the global variable usage but: Reviewed-by: Nathan Lynch Thanks Nathan, I don't like either the global variable usage but

Re: [PATCH v5] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM

2021-08-03 Thread Nathan Lynch
Laurent Dufour writes: > V5: > - Reword the commit's description to address Nathan's comments. Thanks. Still don't like the global variable usage but: Reviewed-by: Nathan Lynch

Re: [PATCH v5] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM

2021-07-19 Thread Laurent Dufour
Hi Michael, Is there a way to get that patch in 5.14? Thanks, Laurent. Le 17/05/2021 à 11:06, Laurent Dufour a écrit : After a LPM, the device tree node ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory may be updated by the hypervisor in the case the NUMA topology of the LPAR's memory is updated. This is

Re: [PATCH v5] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM

2021-07-01 Thread Laurent Dufour
Hi Michael, Do you mind taking this patch of 5.14? Thanks, Laurent. Le 17/05/2021 à 11:06, Laurent Dufour a écrit : After a LPM, the device tree node ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory may be updated by the hypervisor in the case the NUMA topology of the LPAR's memory is updated. This is

[PATCH v5] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM

2021-05-17 Thread Laurent Dufour
After a LPM, the device tree node ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory may be updated by the hypervisor in the case the NUMA topology of the LPAR's memory is updated. This is handled by the kernel, but the memory's node is not updated because there is no way to move a memory block between nodes