On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Brian Gerst wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> In general, there's no need for the "restore sigmask" flag to live in
>> ti->flags. alpha, ia64, microblaze, powerpc, sh, sparc (64-bit only),
>>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> In general, there's no need for the "restore sigmask" flag to live in
> ti->flags. alpha, ia64, microblaze, powerpc, sh, sparc (64-bit only),
> tile, and x86 use essentially identical alternative implementations,
>
In general, there's no need for the "restore sigmask" flag to live in
ti->flags. alpha, ia64, microblaze, powerpc, sh, sparc (64-bit only),
tile, and x86 use essentially identical alternative implementations,
placing the flag in ti->status.
Replace those optimized implementations with an equally