Hi Kim,
I've tested your patch on x86 and powerpc and it looks fine to me. Can you
please
put your signed-off-by.
Please add Act-by: Ravi Bangoria as well.
Regards,
-Ravi
On Wednesday 24 August 2016 02:06 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:17:16 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>>
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 03:36:17PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:17:16 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:29:33 +0530
> > > Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> > >
> > >> Changes in v6:
> > >> - Ins
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:17:16 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:29:33 +0530
> > Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> >
> >> Changes in v6:
> >> - Instead of adding only those instructions defined in #ifdef __arm__,
> >> add all in
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:29:33 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
>> Changes in v6:
>> - Instead of adding only those instructions defined in #ifdef __arm__,
>> add all instructions from default table to arm table.
> ..
>> +static str
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:29:33 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Changes in v6:
> - Instead of adding only those instructions defined in #ifdef __arm__,
> add all instructions from default table to arm table.
..
> +static struct ins instructions_arm[] = {
> { .name = "add", .ops = &mov_op
Change current data structures and function to enable cross arch
annotate.
Current perf implementation does not support cross arch annotate.
To make it truly cross arch, instruction table of all arch should
be present in perf binary. And use appropriate table based on arch
where perf.data was reco
