On 11/21/19 12:06 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:13:31PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
A subsequent patch requires access to gup flags, so
pass the flags argument through to the __gup_device_*
functions.
Looks fine, but why not fold this into the patch using the flags.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:13:31PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> A subsequent patch requires access to gup flags, so
> pass the flags argument through to the __gup_device_*
> functions.
Looks fine, but why not fold this into the patch using the flags.
Also you can use up your full 73 chars per
A subsequent patch requires access to gup flags, so
pass the flags argument through to the __gup_device_*
functions.
Also placate checkpatch.pl by shortening a nearby line.
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov
Signed-off-by: John
