Hi Palmer,
Do you intend to pull that in for-next or not yet? Can I do something to help?
Thanks,
Alex
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 9:05 AM Alexandre ghiti wrote:
>
> Hi Palmer,
>
> Do you think this could go in for-next?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> On 12/6/21 10:44, Alexandre ghiti wrote:
> >
Hi Palmer,
Do you think this could go in for-next?
Thanks,
Alex
On 12/6/21 10:44, Alexandre ghiti wrote:
@Palmer, can I do anything for that to be pulled in 5.17?
Thanks,
Alex
On 10/27/21 07:04, Alexandre ghiti wrote:
Hi Palmer,
On 10/26/21 11:29 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Sat, 09
@Palmer, can I do anything for that to be pulled in 5.17?
Thanks,
Alex
On 10/27/21 07:04, Alexandre ghiti wrote:
Hi Palmer,
On 10/26/21 11:29 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Sat, 09 Oct 2021 10:20:20 PDT (-0700), a...@ghiti.fr wrote:
Arf, I have sent this patchset with the wrong email
Hi Palmer,
On 10/26/21 11:29 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Oct 2021 10:20:20 PDT (-0700), a...@ghiti.fr wrote:
>> Arf, I have sent this patchset with the wrong email address. @Palmer
>> tell me if you want me to resend it correctly.
>
> Sorry for being kind of slow here. It's fine:
On Sat, 09 Oct 2021 10:20:20 PDT (-0700), a...@ghiti.fr wrote:
Arf, I have sent this patchset with the wrong email address. @Palmer
tell me if you want me to resend it correctly.
Sorry for being kind of slow here. It's fine: there's a "From:" in the
patch, and git picks those up so it'll
From: Alexandre Ghiti
This config allows to compile 64b kernel as PIE and to relocate it at
any virtual address at runtime: this paves the way to KASLR.
Runtime relocation is possible since relocation metadata are embedded into
the kernel.
Note that relocating at runtime introduces an overhead
Arf, I have sent this patchset with the wrong email address. @Palmer
tell me if you want me to resend it correctly.
Thanks,
Alex
On 10/9/21 7:12 PM, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> From: Alexandre Ghiti
>
> This config allows to compile 64b kernel as PIE and to relocate it at
> any virtual address at
