On Tue, 8 Jan 2019, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > The reason why that doesn't work boils down to introspection. (This
> > was mentioned elsewhere in this email thread.) For example, we
> > presently have code like this,
> >
> > ssize_t nvram_get_size(void)
> > {
> >if (ppc_md.nvram_size)
Finn Thain writes:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
>> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>> > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 1:43 AM Finn Thain
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> +static ssize_t ppc_nvram_get_size(void)
>> >> +{
>> >> + if (ppc_md.nvram_size)
>> >> + return
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
> > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 1:43 AM Finn Thain
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +static ssize_t ppc_nvram_get_size(void)
> >> +{
> >> + if (ppc_md.nvram_size)
> >> + return ppc_md.nvram_size();
> >> + return
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 1:43 AM Finn Thain wrote:
>
>> +static ssize_t ppc_nvram_get_size(void)
>> +{
>> + if (ppc_md.nvram_size)
>> + return ppc_md.nvram_size();
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +}
>
>> +const struct nvram_ops arch_nvram_ops = {
>> +
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 4:29 AM Finn Thain wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > With the current method, it does seem odd to have a single
> > > per-architecture instance of the exported structure containing
> > >
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 4:29 AM Finn Thain wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 1:43 AM Finn Thain
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +static ssize_t ppc_nvram_get_size(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 4:29 AM Finn Thain wrote:
>
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 1:43 AM Finn Thain
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +static ssize_t ppc_nvram_get_size(void)
> > > +{
> > > + if (ppc_md.nvram_size)
> > > + return
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 1:43 AM Finn Thain wrote:
>
> > +static ssize_t ppc_nvram_get_size(void)
> > +{
> > + if (ppc_md.nvram_size)
> > + return ppc_md.nvram_size();
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +}
>
> > +const struct
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 1:43 AM Finn Thain wrote:
> +static ssize_t ppc_nvram_get_size(void)
> +{
> + if (ppc_md.nvram_size)
> + return ppc_md.nvram_size();
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +const struct nvram_ops arch_nvram_ops = {
> + .read =
Adopt nvram module to reduce code duplication. This means CONFIG_NVRAM
becomes available to CONFIG_PPC64 builds (until now it was only PPC32).
The IOC_NVRAM_GET_OFFSET ioctl as implemented on PPC64 validates the offset
returned by pmac_get_partition(). Add this test to the nvram module.
Note
10 matches
Mail list logo
