On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 05:17:25PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 05/03/2016 11:22 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>Each PHB maintains an array helping to translate 2-bytes Request
>>ID (RID) to PE# with the assumption that PE# takes one byte, meaning
>>that we can't have more than 256 PEs. However,
On 05/03/2016 11:22 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
Each PHB maintains an array helping to translate 2-bytes Request
ID (RID) to PE# with the assumption that PE# takes one byte, meaning
that we can't have more than 256 PEs. However, pci_dn->pe_number
already had 4-bytes for the PE#.
Can you possibly have
Each PHB maintains an array helping to translate 2-bytes Request
ID (RID) to PE# with the assumption that PE# takes one byte, meaning
that we can't have more than 256 PEs. However, pci_dn->pe_number
already had 4-bytes for the PE#.
This extends the PE# capacity for every PHB. After that, the PE nu