On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:06:54AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 22/02/2024 à 03:55, Charlie Jenkins a écrit :
> > The test cases for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic were failing on a
> > variety of architectures that are big endian or do not support
> > misalgined accesses. Both of
On 2/23/24 02:28, David Laight wrote:
From: Christophe Leroy
Sent: 23 February 2024 10:07
...
+/* Ethernet headers are 14 bytes and NET_IP_ALIGN is used to align them */
+#define IP_ALIGNMENT (14 + NET_IP_ALIGN)
Only if no VLAN.
When using VLANs it is 4 bytes more. But why do you mind that
From: Christophe Leroy
> Sent: 23 February 2024 10:07
...
> > +/* Ethernet headers are 14 bytes and NET_IP_ALIGN is used to align them */
> > +#define IP_ALIGNMENT (14 + NET_IP_ALIGN)
>
> Only if no VLAN.
>
> When using VLANs it is 4 bytes more. But why do you mind that at all ?
Wasn't one
Le 22/02/2024 à 03:55, Charlie Jenkins a écrit :
> The test cases for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic were failing on a
> variety of architectures that are big endian or do not support
> misalgined accesses. Both of these test cases are changed to support big
> and little endian architectures.
