On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:27:36PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Nicolin Chen writes:
> > The boundary_size might be as large as ULONG_MAX, which means
> > that a device has no specific boundary limit. So either "+ 1"
> > or passing it to ALIGN() would potentially overflow.
> >
> > According to
Nicolin Chen writes:
> The boundary_size might be as large as ULONG_MAX, which means
> that a device has no specific boundary limit. So either "+ 1"
> or passing it to ALIGN() would potentially overflow.
>
> According to kernel defines:
> #define ALIGN_MASK(x, mask) (((x) + (mask)) & ~(mask))
The boundary_size might be as large as ULONG_MAX, which means
that a device has no specific boundary limit. So either "+ 1"
or passing it to ALIGN() would potentially overflow.
According to kernel defines:
#define ALIGN_MASK(x, mask) (((x) + (mask)) & ~(mask))
#define ALIGN(x, a) ALIGN_MAS
