On Wed, 21 May 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > Currently, if allocation constraint to node is NUMA_NO_NODE, we search > a partial slab on numa_node_id() node. This doesn't work properly on the > system having memoryless node, since it can have no memory on that node and > there must be no partial slab on that node. > > On that node, page allocation always fallback to numa_mem_id() first. So > searching a partial slab on numa_node_id() in that case is proper solution > for memoryless node case. > > Acked-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <n...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com> > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com> > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > index 545a170..cc1f995 100644 > --- a/mm/slub.c > +++ b/mm/slub.c > @@ -1698,7 +1698,7 @@ static void *get_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t > flags, int node, > struct kmem_cache_cpu *c) > { > void *object; > - int searchnode = (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) ? numa_node_id() : node; > + int searchnode = (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) ? numa_mem_id() : node; > > object = get_partial_node(s, get_node(s, searchnode), c, flags); > if (object || node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
Andrew, can you merge this please? It's still not in linux-next. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev