On Wed, Apr 10, 2024, at 06:54, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 19/02/2024 à 16:30, Vladimir Oltean a écrit :
>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:23:26AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
>>> smp_call_function_single disables IRQs when executing the callback. To
>>> prevent deadlocks, we must disable IRQs when
Hi Vladimir,
Le 19/02/2024 à 16:30, Vladimir Oltean a écrit :
> Hi Sean,
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:23:26AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> smp_call_function_single disables IRQs when executing the callback. To
>> prevent deadlocks, we must disable IRQs when taking cgr_lock elsewhere.
>> This
On 2/19/24 10:30, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:23:26AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> smp_call_function_single disables IRQs when executing the callback. To
>> prevent deadlocks, we must disable IRQs when taking cgr_lock elsewhere.
>> This is already done by
Hi Sean,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:23:26AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> smp_call_function_single disables IRQs when executing the callback. To
> prevent deadlocks, we must disable IRQs when taking cgr_lock elsewhere.
> This is already done by qman_update_cgr and qman_delete_cgr; fix the
> other
smp_call_function_single disables IRQs when executing the callback. To
prevent deadlocks, we must disable IRQs when taking cgr_lock elsewhere.
This is already done by qman_update_cgr and qman_delete_cgr; fix the
other lockers.
Fixes: 96f413f47677 ("soc/fsl/qbman: fix issue in
