Re: [RFC] powerpc/boot: add kernel,end node to the cuboot target

2008-09-30 Thread Milton Miller
On Sep 30, 2008, at 12:21 PM, Sebastian Siewior wrote: Milton Miller wrote: |load: entry = 0x80053c flags = 0 |nr_segments = 2 |segment[0].buf = 0x1002b8f0 |segment[0].bufsz = 80 |segment[0].mem = (nil) |segment[0].memsz = 1000 |segment[1].buf = 0x4803f008 |segment[1].bufsz = 3a3138 |segme

Re: [RFC] powerpc/boot: add kernel,end node to the cuboot target

2008-09-30 Thread Sebastian Siewior
Milton Miller wrote: |load: entry = 0x80053c flags = 0 |nr_segments = 2 |segment[0].buf = 0x1002b8f0 |segment[0].bufsz = 80 |segment[0].mem = (nil) |segment[0].memsz = 1000 |segment[1].buf = 0x4803f008 |segment[1].bufsz = 3a3138 |segment[1].mem = 0x80 |segment[1].memsz = 3b I w

Re: [RFC] powerpc/boot: add kernel,end node to the cuboot target

2008-09-30 Thread Milton Miller
On Sep 29, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Sebastian Siewior wrote: * Milton Miller | 2008-09-23 20:24:02 [-0500]: If you have any questions about kdump or what needs to happen, please feel free to contact me I copied most of the 64bit code to parse the device tree without the pci nodes & moved it to 3

Re: [RFC] powerpc/boot: add kernel,end node to the cuboot target

2008-09-29 Thread Sebastian Siewior
* Milton Miller | 2008-09-23 20:24:02 [-0500]: >If you have any questions about kdump or what needs to happen, >please feel free to contact me either by email or on irc (sometimes >I use mdm other times the email login as my nick, and when connected >I tend to leave it well past the hours I am at

Re: [RFC] powerpc/boot: add kernel,end node to the cuboot target

2008-09-25 Thread Sebastian Siewior
Milton Miller wrote: On Wed Sep 24 at about 05:54:04 EST 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote: this could be used by the kexec userland code. NACK. [...] Thanks for explanation. I just went through the kexec user land code and saw that the 64bit code uses the device tree to obtain some address and 3

Re: [RFC] powerpc/boot: add kernel,end node to the cuboot target

2008-09-25 Thread Sebastian Siewior
Kumar Gala wrote: I missing why you are doing this? Do you plan on using it w/32-bit kexec? Yes. I plan to kexec my mpc8544 board. - k Sebastian ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-de

[RFC] powerpc/boot: add kernel,end node to the cuboot target

2008-09-23 Thread Milton Miller
On Wed Sep 24 at about 05:54:04 EST 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > this could be used by the kexec userland code. NACK. First of all, you fail to justify why it is needed. Second of all, its in the wrong place, if it were needed. The code in arch/powerpc/boot does not get executed on all plat

Re: [RFC] powerpc/boot: add kernel,end node to the cuboot target

2008-09-23 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Sebastian Siewior wrote: this could be used by the kexec userland code. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Siewior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This is done by the 64bit kexec code allready. The 32bit doesn't use the device tree at all. I'm not sure whether the node has to be

[RFC] powerpc/boot: add kernel,end node to the cuboot target

2008-09-23 Thread Sebastian Siewior
this could be used by the kexec userland code. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Siewior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This is done by the 64bit kexec code allready. The 32bit doesn't use the device tree at all. I'm not sure whether the node has to be a 32bit or 64bit value. arch/powerpc/boot/main.c |6 +++