I'm a reverse polish kind of guy. I preferring 'subject'_'action'
over 'action'_'subject' just because it groups like subjects together.
But it doesn't matter much, especially in this case where 'subject'
is in a group of exactly 1. :-)
I'll do whichever you prefer.
I just caught
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 20:02 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I'm a reverse polish kind of guy. I preferring 'subject'_'action'
over 'action'_'subject' just because it groups like subjects together.
But it doesn't matter much, especially in this case where 'subject'
is in a group of
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 23:46 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
prototype implementation. This probably doesn't work at all right now.
Ben, I'm posting this now to get your thoughts before I go too far down
this path.
Looks ok. I was initially thinking
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 23:46 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
prototype implementation. This probably doesn't work at all right now.
Ben, I'm posting this now to
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
prototype implementation. This probably doesn't work at all right now.
Ben, I'm posting this now to get your thoughts before I go too far down
this path.
Cheers,
g.
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h|3 ++
