On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:24 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:20 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM Rafael J. Wysocki
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:33 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > @@ -909,8 +881,7 @@ struct pci_bus
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:20 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:33 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > @@ -909,8 +881,7 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct
> > > acpi_pci_root *root,
> > > int ret,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:33 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > @@ -909,8 +881,7 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct
> > acpi_pci_root *root,
> > int ret, busnum = root->secondary.start;
> > struct acpi_device
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:33 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> The acpi_pci_create_root_bus() can be fully integrated into
> acpi_pci_root_create(), improving a few things:
>
> * We can call pci_scan_root_bus_bridge(), which registers and
> scans the bridge in one step.
> * After a failure in
The acpi_pci_create_root_bus() can be fully integrated into
acpi_pci_root_create(), improving a few things:
* We can call pci_scan_root_bus_bridge(), which registers and
scans the bridge in one step.
* After a failure in pci_register_host_bridge(), we correctly
clean up the resources.
* The
