Segher Boessenkool writes:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 11:16:35AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:19:34AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > What we could do is switch to the `UL` macro from include/linux/const.h,
>> > rather than using our own ASM_CONST.
>>
>> You
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 11:16:35AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:19:34AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > What we could do is switch to the `UL` macro from include/linux/const.h,
> > rather than using our own ASM_CONST.
>
> You need gas 2.28 or later for that
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:19:34AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> What we could do is switch to the `UL` macro from include/linux/const.h,
> rather than using our own ASM_CONST.
You need gas 2.28 or later for that though.
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=86b80085
Hi Leonardo,
Leonardo Bras writes:
> The main reason of this change is to make these bitmasks more readable.
>
> The macro ASM_CONST() just appends an UL to it's parameter, so it can be
> easily replaced by BIT_MASK, that already uses a UL representation.
>
> ASM_CONST() in this file may behave
Sorry, there is a typo on my commit message.
's/BIT_MASK/BIT/'
On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 15:02 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> The main reason of this change is to make these bitmasks more readable.
>
> The macro ASM_CONST() just appends an UL to it's parameter, so it can be
> easily replaced by
The main reason of this change is to make these bitmasks more readable.
The macro ASM_CONST() just appends an UL to it's parameter, so it can be
easily replaced by BIT_MASK, that already uses a UL representation.
ASM_CONST() in this file may behave different if __ASSEMBLY__ is defined,
as it is
