On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 12:49 PM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 11:42 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:19:39PM -0800, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > > Well, better compression ratios for one :)
> > >
> > > I think a long time ago there were complaints that
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 11:42 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:19:39PM -0800, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > Well, better compression ratios for one :)
> >
> > I think a long time ago there were complaints that zsmalloc had higher
> > latency than zbud/z3fold, but since then a
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:19:39PM -0800, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> Well, better compression ratios for one :)
>
> I think a long time ago there were complaints that zsmalloc had higher
> latency than zbud/z3fold, but since then a lot of things have changed
> (including nice compaction optimization
Vitaly Wool writes:
Existing users, if any, should voice their objections. Otherwise, we can
remove z3fold in a few releases.
At this point I NACK this patch. We're about to submit an allocator
which is clearly better that z3fold and is faster that zsmalloc in
most cases and that submission
Yosry Ahmed writes:
The z3fold compressed pages allocator is not widely used, most users use
zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of zsmalloc in comparison is the
dependency on MMU, and zbud is a more common option for !MMU as it was
the default zswap allocator for a long time.
In hopes of having a
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 7:39 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:38:30PM -0800, Nhat Pham wrote:
> > >
> > > I thought deprecating z3fold is the low hanging fruit. Then, once we
> > > can sort out the MMU dependency in zsmalloc, we can go after zbud as
> > > well.
> >
> >
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:38:30PM -0800, Nhat Pham wrote:
> >
> > I thought deprecating z3fold is the low hanging fruit. Then, once we
> > can sort out the MMU dependency in zsmalloc, we can go after zbud as
> > well.
>
> Makes sense to me. Should we do the same thing to zbud? We probably
> have
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 8:31 PM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
>
> The z3fold compressed pages allocator is not widely used, most users use
> zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of zsmalloc in comparison is the
> dependency on MMU, and zbud is a more common option for !MMU as it was
> the default zswap allocator
On (24/01/15 08:47), Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > At this point I NACK this patch. We're about to submit an allocator
> > which is clearly better that z3fold and is faster that zsmalloc in
> > most cases and that submission will mark z3fold as deprecated. But for
> > now this move is premature.
>
> I
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 4:27 AM Vitaly Wool wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 8:31 PM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> >
> > The z3fold compressed pages allocator is not widely used, most users use
> > zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of zsmalloc in comparison is the
> > dependency on MMU, and zbud is a
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 4:27 AM Vitaly Wool wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 8:31 PM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> >
> > The z3fold compressed pages allocator is not widely used, most users use
> > zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of zsmalloc in comparison is the
> > dependency on MMU, and zbud is a
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 2:42 PM Nhat Pham wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 10:49 AM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 4:38 PM Nhat Pham wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:37 PM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:42 AM Nhat Pham wrote:
>
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 10:49 AM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 4:38 PM Nhat Pham wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:37 PM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:42 AM Nhat Pham wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:31 AM Yosry Ahmed
> > >
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 4:38 PM Nhat Pham wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:37 PM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:42 AM Nhat Pham wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:31 AM Yosry Ahmed
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The z3fold compressed pages allocator is not
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:37 PM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:42 AM Nhat Pham wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:31 AM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > >
> > > The z3fold compressed pages allocator is not widely used, most users use
> > > zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:42 AM Nhat Pham wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:31 AM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> >
> > The z3fold compressed pages allocator is not widely used, most users use
> > zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of zsmalloc in comparison is the
> > dependency on MMU, and zbud is a
The z3fold compressed pages allocator is not widely used, most users use
zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of zsmalloc in comparison is the
dependency on MMU, and zbud is a more common option for !MMU as it was
the default zswap allocator for a long time.
In hopes of having a single compressed
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:31 AM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
>
> The z3fold compressed pages allocator is not widely used, most users use
> zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of zsmalloc in comparison is the
> dependency on MMU, and zbud is a more common option for !MMU as it was
> the default zswap
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:31 AM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
>
> The z3fold compressed pages allocator is not widely used, most users use
> zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of zsmalloc in comparison is the
> dependency on MMU, and zbud is a more common option for !MMU as it was
> the default zswap
19 matches
Mail list logo
