On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 10:33:48AM +0800, Greentime Hu wrote:
> Mike Rapoport 於 2018年9月6日 週四 上午12:04寫道：
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > These patches switch early memory managment to use memblock directly
> > without any bootmem compatibility wrappers. As the result both bootmem and
> > nobootmem are
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:04:47PM +, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
>
>
> On 9/6/18 5:15 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 05-09-18 18:59:15, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > [...]
> >> 325 files changed, 846 insertions(+), 2478 deletions(-)
> >> delete mode 100644 include/linux/bootmem.h
> >> delete
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:15:38AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 05-09-18 18:59:15, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> [...]
> > 325 files changed, 846 insertions(+), 2478 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 include/linux/bootmem.h
> > delete mode 100644 mm/bootmem.c
> > delete mode 100644
On 9/6/18 5:15 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 05-09-18 18:59:15, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> [...]
>> 325 files changed, 846 insertions(+), 2478 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 include/linux/bootmem.h
>> delete mode 100644 mm/bootmem.c
>> delete mode 100644 mm/nobootmem.c
>
> This is really
On Wed 05-09-18 18:59:15, Mike Rapoport wrote:
[...]
> 325 files changed, 846 insertions(+), 2478 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 include/linux/bootmem.h
> delete mode 100644 mm/bootmem.c
> delete mode 100644 mm/nobootmem.c
This is really impressive! Thanks a lot for working on this. I wish
Mike Rapoport 於 2018年9月6日 週四 上午12:04寫道：
>
> Hi,
>
> These patches switch early memory managment to use memblock directly
> without any bootmem compatibility wrappers. As the result both bootmem and
> nobootmem are removed.
>
> There are still a couple of things to sort out, the most important is
Hi,
These patches switch early memory managment to use memblock directly
without any bootmem compatibility wrappers. As the result both bootmem and
nobootmem are removed.
There are still a couple of things to sort out, the most important is the
removal of bootmem usage in MIPS.
Still, IMHO,
