On 7/26/23 13:20, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On 7/24/2023 10:30 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
>>> On 7/19/2023 5:14 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
This is the next iteration of implementing fd-based (instead of vma-based)
On 7/26/2023 7:54 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
>> On 7/24/2023 10:30 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
/proc//smaps
7f528be0-7f5c8be0 rw-p 00:01 26629
/memfd:memory-backend-memfd-shared
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On 7/24/2023 10:30 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >> Starting an SNP guest with 40G memory with memory interleave between
> >> Node2 and Node3
> >>
> >> $ numactl -i 2,3 ./bootg_snp.sh
> >>
> >> PID USER PR NI
Hi Sean,
On 7/24/2023 10:30 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
>> On 7/19/2023 5:14 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> This is the next iteration of implementing fd-based (instead of vma-based)
>>> memory for KVM guests. If you want the full
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> On 7/19/2023 5:14 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > This is the next iteration of implementing fd-based (instead of vma-based)
> > memory for KVM guests. If you want the full background of why we are doing
> > this, please go read the v10 cover
On 7/19/2023 5:14 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> This is the next iteration of implementing fd-based (instead of vma-based)
> memory for KVM guests. If you want the full background of why we are doing
> this, please go read the v10 cover letter[1].
>
> The biggest change from v10 is to
This is the next iteration of implementing fd-based (instead of vma-based)
memory for KVM guests. If you want the full background of why we are doing
this, please go read the v10 cover letter[1].
The biggest change from v10 is to implement the backing storage in KVM
itself, and expose it via a
