Hi Arnd,
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 19:23, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:27 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > @@ -24,28 +24,28 @@
> > 14 common mknod sys_mknod
> > 15 common chmod sys_chmod
> > 16 common lchown
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:35 AM Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:27 PM Michael Ellerman
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> sys_ni_syscall is the "not-implemented" syscall syscall, which just
> >> returns -ENOSYS.
> >>
> >> But unless you know that
Hi Arnd,
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:27 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>
>> sys_ni_syscall is the "not-implemented" syscall syscall, which just
>> returns -ENOSYS.
>>
>> But unless you know that it's not obvious what it does, and even if
>> you do know what it means it doesn't
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:27 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> sys_ni_syscall is the "not-implemented" syscall syscall, which just
> returns -ENOSYS.
>
> But unless you know that it's not obvious what it does, and even if
> you do know what it means it doesn't stand out that well from other
> real sy
sys_ni_syscall is the "not-implemented" syscall syscall, which just
returns -ENOSYS.
But unless you know that it's not obvious what it does, and even if
you do know what it means it doesn't stand out that well from other
real syscalls.
So teach the scripts to treat "none" as a synonym for
"sys_ni
