* Nicholas Piggin:
> So I would be disinclined to use SIGSYS unless there are no other better
> signal types, and we don't want to use SIGILL for some good reason -- is
> there a good reason to add complexity for userspace by differentiating
> these two situations?
No, SIGILL seems fine to
Excerpts from Florian Weimer's message of April 22, 2020 5:15 pm:
> * Nicholas Piggin:
>
>> Another option would be to use a different signal. I don't see that any
>> are more suitable.
>
> SIGSYS comes to my mind. But I don't know how exclusively it is
> associated with seccomp these days.
* Nicholas Piggin:
> Another option would be to use a different signal. I don't see that any
> are more suitable.
SIGSYS comes to my mind. But I don't know how exclusively it is
associated with seccomp these days.
