On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:27:01PM +, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > > Hmm, I tried that patch, it makes the warning go away. But then I
> > > > triggered
Thomas Gleixner writes:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > > Hmm, I tried that patch, it makes the warning go away. But then I
>> > > triggered a deliberate hard
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Hmm, I tried that patch, it makes the warning go away. But then I
> > > triggered a deliberate hard lockup and got nothing.
> > >
> > > Then I went back to
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Hmm, I tried that patch, it makes the warning go away. But then I
> > triggered a deliberate hard lockup and got nothing.
> >
> > Then I went back to the existing code (in linux-next), and I still get
> >
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner writes:
> >> The first call is new because previously watchdog_nmi_reconfigure()
> >> wasn't called from softlockup_reconfigure_threads().
> >
> > Hmm, don't you have the same problem with CPU hotplug or do you just
Thomas Gleixner writes:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>> Unfortunately this is hitting the WARN_ON in start_wd_cpu() on powerpc
>> because we're calling it multiple times for the boot CPU.
>>
>> The first call is via:
>>
>>
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 09:04:03 +0200 (CEST)
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > > Unfortunately this is hitting the
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 09:04:03 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > > Unfortunately this is hitting the WARN_ON in start_wd_cpu() on powerpc
> > > because we're
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > Unfortunately this is hitting the WARN_ON in start_wd_cpu() on powerpc
> > because we're calling it multiple times for the boot CPU.
> >
> > The first call is via:
> >
> >
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> Unfortunately this is hitting the WARN_ON in start_wd_cpu() on powerpc
> because we're calling it multiple times for the boot CPU.
>
> The first call is via:
>
> start_wd_on_cpu+0x80/0x2f0
> watchdog_nmi_reconfigure+0x124/0x170
>
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Gleixner writes:
> Both the perf reconfiguration and the powerpc watchdog_nmi_reconfigure()
> need to be done in two steps.
>
> 1) Stop all NMIs
> 2) Read the new parameters and start NMIs
>
> Right now watchdog_nmi_reconfigure() is a combination
Both the perf reconfiguration and the powerpc watchdog_nmi_reconfigure()
need to be done in two steps.
1) Stop all NMIs
2) Read the new parameters and start NMIs
Right now watchdog_nmi_reconfigure() is a combination of both. To allow a
clean reconfiguration add a 'run' argument and
12 matches
Mail list logo